Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

In+ersec+ion for Spatial People

Slashgeo Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

MapQuest Drops Paper Maps

posted by Satri on Friday September 22, @08:08AM   Printer-friendly   Email story  Permalink  Trackback URI  Slashdotthis  Diggthis  Del.icio.us
from the they-were-printing-maps? dept.
The Cartography blog links to a Mercury News article where we learn MapQuest will stop printing paper maps and concentrated on digital presence. From the article: "MapQuest's core business is its online mapping Web site, which gives users driving directions. Though MapQuest is still the leader in the online mapping industry, it has faced growing competition recently from Yahoo and Google. MapQuest attracted more than 52 million unique visitors in August, more than double the number of visitors to No. 2 Google Maps, according to comScore Media Metrix."

Related Stories

Application Domains: Paper Maps for Canadians? 1 comment [+]
The Cartography blog shares information on the Maps for Canadians project related to this previous story on the end of paper topographical maps in Canada. From the Maps for Canadians website: "The Ministry of Natural Resources Canada will discontinue the printing of paper topographic maps and will close the Canada Map Office effective January 2007. Maps will be available in digital format through the Internet. This new policy will not meet the requirements of the general public and will effectively remove access to topographic maps from Canadians and their families especially those not in major centres. "
MapQuest Now with Aerial Imagery [+]
The import cartography blog tells us about MapQuest adding aerial photography on their web mapping site. From All Points Blog: "There is no "hybrid" just now and as noted on Import Cartography, the data is from i-cubed. [...] I do like that the button says "aerial imagery" not satellite."
New MapQuest Beta [+]
The Map Room shortly discuss the new MapQuest Beta and its blog. From the blog: "The beta’s upgrades are to MapQuest’s user interface, which was, let’s be honest, so last century; the features are outlined here. The problem is, these features have been offered by MapQuest’s competition for years — it’s October 2007, and only now is MapQuest allowing its users to input addresses in a single input box." All Points Blog also offers their own analysis of the new beta and links to a TechCrunch article. See also previous related stories below.
Application Domains: The Paperless Map Is the Killer App [+]
GIS Lounge links to a BusinessWeek article named "The Paperless Map Is the Killer App". From the article: "First, cell phones made the streetcorner pay phone obsolete. Now they're doing away with the need to ask for directions. A surge in phones with built-in satellite navigation capability has sparked a wave of creative mapping and locating services. And it has set off a multibillion-dollar scramble by companies to buy up digital navigation technologies. [...] As more players jump into navigation, it has triggered a wave of deal-making that reflects the nervousness of established players. Makers of car-based or other dedicated (nonphone) devices worry that competitors will gain control of essential mapping data, which show names and locations of streets, homes, restaurants, and hotels and must be regularly updated." Related are the 162 million navigation-ready cell phones hitting the streets this year.
Google Maps Making Strides on MapQuest [+]
All Points Blog has an article detailing how Google is slowly gaining ground in the web mapping arena. From their summary : "This [Google Maps up 7%] throttled down MapQuest's lead over Google Maps significantly, falling from 429 percent more visits a year ago to just 126 percent more visits.

Still, MapQuest has more than 50% of mapping hits to Google's 22% and Yahoo's 13% (and dropping)."


For more information, as well as links to the actual article, head on over to All Points Blog.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.