Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

In+ersec+ion for Spatial People

Using Geographical Standards in Web Applications

posted by Satri on Monday March 19, @08:35AM   Printer-friendly   Email story  Permalink  Trackback URI  Slashdotthis  Diggthis  Del.icio.us
from the standards-at-full-speed dept.
Brudert writes "I am developing a web mapping application called Trailtracer that will ultimately serve as a map viewing, editing, and sharing service. I am a huge fan of standards and am interested in any advice or guidance that the Slashgeo community can offer. I plan on using GML and geoRSS but are these the right choices? Are there other standards I should consider?"

Related Stories

TrailRunner: New Route Planning Software [+]
The gisuser weblog tells us about new software (MacOS X and iPod) for route planning. From the TrailRunner website: "TrailRunner is a route planning software for all kinds of long distance sports like running, biking, hiking, inline-skating, skiing and more. If you ever asked yourself how long your workout routes are and what route you should choose for this evening - then TrailRunner should be your training-partner."
"Roll Your Own" Google Earth and GPX for Mountain Biking 2 comments [+]
Nathan Cloud writes "We have been collecting map data for mountain biking over at Crankfire for many years now. Recently I like to think we made things a lot more useful for users with a knack for maps: within our interactive mapper, you can now create yourself dynamically generated KML and/or GPX files for whichever layers (GPS tracks and Waypoints) you have currently have active. A better description can be read here. For an example, check this map out. I am not sure if this is anything that would be of interest to the Slashgeo community, but I have to try... right? ;) Plus I think I may have picked a tough niche, mountain bikers with an obsession with maps? :) Thanks, Nathan"
Industry: Geospatial Standards Block Innovation? 4 comments [+]
Charlie Savage has an interesting and severe critic of geospatial standards, including GML, WMS, SLD, WFS and of course KML and GeoRSS are also discussed. Here's a recent previous entry from the same blog on the same topic. From the first link: "So do you see these standards used on the Web? I sure don't. Instead I see people using RSS and ATOM with GeoRSS, or shoehorning feature information into KML. There is event talk of shoehorning GML into KML. [...] So standards strike out on map rendering and sharing geographic features, but have succeeded in specifying locations and custom map content. And there is an interesting pattern here - the dejure standards have failed, while the defacto standards have succeeded."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • by Satri (3) on Monday March 19, @11:41AM (#1323)
    ( http://alexandreleroux.blogspot.com/ | Last Journal: Friday March 17, @04:07PM )
    It really depends on what you want to do. In my opinion, standards are essential to any application's future. In this case, start with the OGC [opengeospatial.org]. They're the ones that manage most of the standards. Then go to the OSGeo [osgeo.org] if you want to find open source software which will allow you to easily implement these standards. Both are necessary stops in the geospatial domain.

    GML could be nice for interoperability if you share data with others, otherwise, most GDAL/OGR [gdal.org]-supported format will do. As for using GeoRSS [slashgeo.org], join the bandwagon! I believe GeoRSS has a bright future (and it's easy to implement).

    Previous OGC [slashgeo.org] and OSGeo [slashgeo.org] stories. See also the related stories above.
    • Re:Some starting points

      (Score:3, Insightful)
      by Anonymous Voxel on Monday March 19, @03:07PM (#1324)
      What my professors used to say was...

      "The beauty about standards is that the are so many of them to choose from."

      This is especially true when one talks about spatial data of any sort. I would suggest to look more closely to your audience. GML is not yet as widely adopted, especially by non-free software. Are you going to need to operate within their realm? Standards are beautiful, I don't disagree, but a standard that is not widely adopted is not as useful as a non-standardized solution with wide adoption.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Some starting points

      (Score:3, Interesting)
      by urbanows (761) on Tuesday March 20, @09:28AM (#1326)
      ( http://urbano.ws/ )
      You may want to check out the GML Viewer which is powered by Community Mapbuilder.

      The GML Viewer can be downloaded from: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group _id=35246&package_id=96549&release_id=471138 [sourceforge.net]
      [ Parent ]